Tiggo8 Pro Max COM vs Tiggo8 Pro Max COM Comparison
Dimensions
5
/
18
/
5
/
4720
/
1860
/
1705
/
2710
/
Fuel Economy
14
/
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
6
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
SONY
/
Transmission
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
235/55 R18
/
235/55 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2000 L
/
254 - 310 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 - 7
/
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
/
2.0L TDGI
/
254 BHP
/
390
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo8 Pro Max COM
- Power Tailgate
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Tiggo8 Pro Max COM
- Power Tailgate
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo8 Pro Max COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo8 Pro Max COM if you care more about overall equipment; choose Tiggo8 Pro Max COM if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo8 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while Tiggo8 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 7.14. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo8 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2710, while Tiggo8 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo8 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive, while Tiggo8 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.