GR86 A/T 2.4L vs Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
208
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
4265 mm
4191
1775 mm
1794
1310 mm
1508
/
2601
/
405
Fuel Economy
13.4
18.5
50 L
50
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Dual
/
Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/40 R18
/
215/40 R18
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 228.0 L
1.0 L - 1.5 L
228 BHP - 233 BHP
116 BHP - 150 BHP
6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission & Automatic Transmission & Manual
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 4 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
1.4 L
Petrol
Gasoline
228 BHP
150 BHP
250 Nm
250
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GR86 A/T 2.4L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Welcome Light
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GR86 A/T 2.4L if you care more about price; choose Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46, while Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) has a wheelbase of 2601. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 A/T 2.4L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.