GR86 A/T 2.4L vs GR86 MT 2.4L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

4

Dimensions

4 Seater

4

18

18

4265 mm

4265

1775 mm

1775

1310 mm

1310

Fuel Economy

13.4

12.2

50 L

50

Comfort

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

Smart Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

✓

✓

Leather

/

Digital

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

Dual

Dual

Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.

Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.

Safety

Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.

Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.

✓

✓

✓

✓

Infotainment

✓

✓

✓

✓

6

6

/

8

Transmission

6-speed Automatic Transmission

6-speed Manual Transmission

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

215/40 R18

215/40 R18

215/40 R18

215/40 R18

Key Spec

2.4 L - 2.4 L

2.4 L - 2.4 L

228 BHP - 228 BHP

228 BHP - 228 BHP

6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission

6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission

Petrol & Gasoline

Petrol & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 4 Seater

4 Seater - 4 Seater

Exterior

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

LED

/

✓

✓

Engine

2.4 L

2.4L

Petrol

Gasoline

228 BHP

228

250 Nm

250

Technologies

✓

✓

✓

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GR86 A/T 2.4L

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • GR86 MT 2.4L

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGR86 MT 2.4L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GR86 A/T 2.4L if you care more about fuel economy; choose GR86 MT 2.4L if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Toyota | GR86 MT 2.4L

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Dodge | Dodge Challenger 2024 3.6L SXT

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Audi | Audi TT 2018 45 TFSI (230 HP)

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls-Royce Spectre 2024 Rolls Royce Spectre 2024 100 kWh AWD

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

BMW | M8 Coupe 2025 Competition

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46, while GR86 MT 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, GR86 A/T 2.4L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while GR86 MT 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 A/T 2.4L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while GR86 MT 2.4L uses No data.