GR86 A/T 2.4L vs Beetle 2.0L S Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

/

/

227 km/h

Dimensions

4 Seater

4 Seater

18

/

4265 mm

4278 mm

1775 mm

1808 mm

1310 mm

1486 mm

/

2537 mm

/

310 L

Fuel Economy

13.4

13.2 Km/L

50 L

55 L

/

13.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

Dual

/

Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.

/

Safety

Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

6

/

Transmission

6-speed Automatic Transmission

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

215/40 R18

/

215/40 R18

/

Key Spec

2.4 L - 2.4 L

2.0 L

228 BHP - 228 BHP

210 BHP

6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission

Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 4 Seater

4 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4 L

2.0 L

Petrol

Gasoline

228 BHP

210 BHP

250 Nm

280 Nm

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GR86 A/T 2.4L

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Beetle 2.0L S

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickBeetle 2.0L S

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GR86 A/T 2.4L if you care more about fuel economy; choose Beetle 2.0L S if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Dodge | Dodge Challenger 2021 3.6L GT

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Toyota | GR86 MT 2.4L

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Dodge | Dodge Challenger 2019 SE 3.6L

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Dodge | Dodge Challenger 2018 SE 3.6L

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Ford | Ford Mustang 2019 3.7L Fastback

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46, while Beetle 2.0L S has a fuel consumption of 7.58. Therefore, GR86 A/T 2.4L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while Beetle 2.0L S has a wheelbase of 2537 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 A/T 2.4L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while Beetle 2.0L S uses Front Wheel Drive.