GR86 A/T 2.4L vs Challenger 3.6L GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
200 km/h
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
4265 mm
5027 mm
1775 mm
1923 mm
1310 mm
1460 mm
/
2 Doors
/
2950 mm
/
459 L
Fuel Economy
13.4
9.8 Km/L
50 L
70 L
/
9.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Entry
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.
/
Safety
Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6-speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/40 R18
/
215/40 R18
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 228.0 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
228 BHP - 233 BHP
300 BHP - 797 BHP
6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission & Automatic Transmission & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 4 Seater
2 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
3.6 L
Petrol
Gasoline
228 BHP
305 BHP
250 Nm
363 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GR86 A/T 2.4L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
Challenger 3.6L GT
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and amazing acceleration
- Classic and bold exterior design
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Difficulty with control and low flexibility
- Lack of Intelligent Systems Technologies
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GR86 A/T 2.4L if you care more about fuel economy; choose Challenger 3.6L GT if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46, while Challenger 3.6L GT has a fuel consumption of 10.2. Therefore, GR86 A/T 2.4L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while Challenger 3.6L GT has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 A/T 2.4L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while Challenger 3.6L GT uses Rear Wheel Drive.