CarteaCompare CarsGR86 A/T 2.4L vs Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T

GR86 A/T 2.4L vs Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

8

/

250 km/h

/

5038 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

4 Seater

4 Seater

18

/

4265 mm

4784 mm

1775 mm

2080 mm

1310 mm

1391 mm

/

2 Doors

/

2710 mm

/

383 L

/

137 m

Fuel Economy

13.4

8.6 Km/L

50 L

60 L

/

8.6 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Smart Entry

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

Fabric

Digital

Digital

/

/

Dual

/

Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.

Bucket

/

/

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

Safety

Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

6

12

/

13.2

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

6-speed Automatic Transmission

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

215/40 R18

/

215/40 R18

/

Key Spec

2.4 L - 228.0 L

2.3 L - 5.2 L

228 BHP - 233 BHP

300 BHP - 760 BHP

6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission & Automatic Transmission & Manual

10 Speed AT / 6 Speed MT & Automatic & Manual

Petrol & Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 4 Seater

2 Seater - 4

Exterior

/

/

LED

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4 L

5.0 L

Petrol

Gasoline

228 BHP

486 BHP

250 Nm

567 Nm

/

V

/

None

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GR86 A/T 2.4L

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGR86 A/T 2.4L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GR86 A/T 2.4L if you care more about price; choose Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Dodge | Dodge Challenger 2020 3.6L GT

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Dodge | Dodge Challenger 2019 3.6L GT

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Beetle 2018 SE Cabriolet

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Beetle 2018 2.0L SEL

Toyota | GR86 A/T 2.4L

VS

Toyota | GR86 MT 2.4L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46, while Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T has a fuel consumption of 11.63. Therefore, GR86 A/T 2.4L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T has a wheelbase of 2710 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 A/T 2.4L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.