Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L EX vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
13.0
8.3
✓
✓
Engine / Motor
175
190
4
4
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
✓
/
4.435
4.275
1.695
1.765
1.705
1.535
2.685
2.570
213
240
Fuel Economy
12.5
15.4
45
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L
2.0 L - 2000 L
103 BHP
145 BHP - 148 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Petrol
103 BHP
148 BHP
135
192
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L EX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L EX if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L EX has a fuel consumption of 8, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L EX has a wheelbase of 2.685, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L EX, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L EX uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.