CarteaCompare CarsTucson 2.0L Smart (AWD) vs Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD) vs Cherokee 3.2L Longitude Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

185 km/h

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4630 mm

4624 mm

1865 mm

1860 mm

1665 mm

1681 mm

2755 mm

2718 mm

539 L

841 L

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

11.5 Km/L

9.9 Km/L

54 L

60 L

11.5 Km/L

9.9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Safety

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.5 L

2.4 L - 3.2 L

132 BHP - 190

184 BHP - 272 BHP

& 7-DCT & AT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

Engine

2.0 L

3.2 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

156 BHP

271 BHP

192 Nm

324 Nm

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
  • Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
  • Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies

Negative

  • Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
  • Engine response and noise at high speeds
  • Storage space is limited as much as

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTucson 2.0L Smart (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD) if you care more about price; choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Hyundai | Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD)

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Hyundai | Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD)

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Hyundai | Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD)

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Hyundai | Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD)

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Hyundai | Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD)

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.7, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2755 mm, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive.