Urban Cruiser GL vs 2008 GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
3
/
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
17
4365
4300
1795
1987
1645
1550
2600
/
210
/
/
545
Fuel Economy
19.8
16.8
45 L
44
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
❌
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
10
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
4
/
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
0.0 L - 1199 L
101 - 101
115 BHP - 155 BHP
6 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.2
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
130
135
230
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Urban Cruiser GL
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
2008 GT
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickUrban Cruiser GL
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Urban Cruiser GL if you care more about price; choose 2008 GT if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Urban Cruiser GL has a fuel consumption of 5.05, while 2008 GT has a fuel consumption of 5.95. Therefore, Urban Cruiser GL is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Urban Cruiser GL has a wheelbase of 2600, while 2008 GT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urban Cruiser GL uses Front Wheel Drive, while 2008 GT uses Front Drive.