Urus S 4.0T V8 vs Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
305 km/h
250 km/h
8
/
3996 cc
/
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5123 mm
5341 mm
2022 mm
2164 mm
1638 mm
1835 mm
3003 mm
3295 mm
617 L
600 L
172 m
/
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
6.7 Km/L
75 L
/
7 Km/L
6.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0 L
6.7 L
650 BHP - 666 BHP
563 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
6.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
666 BHP
563 BHP
850 Nm
850 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Urus S 4.0T V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Urus S 4.0T V8 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Urus S 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a fuel consumption of 14.93. Therefore, Urus S 4.0T V8 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Urus S 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3003 mm, while Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a wheelbase of 3295 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urus S 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive, while Cullinan 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.