Urus S 4.0T V8 vs Maybach EQS SUV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
305 km/h
210
8
/
3996 cc
/
Dimensions
4 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
5123 mm
5,125
2022 mm
2,157
1638 mm
1,718
3003 mm
3,210
617 L
/
172 m
/
/
3,000
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
/
75 L
/
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
/
1-speed direct drive (EV)
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0 L
/
650 BHP - 800 BHP
357 BHP - 650
Automatic
1-speed direct drive (EV) & Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
4 Seater
5 - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
485 km - 700 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
666 BHP
650
850 Nm
950
/
484
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Urus S 4.0T V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Maybach EQS SUV
Review Comparison
Positive
- Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
- Unique and eye catching exterior design.
- A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.
Negative
- The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
- High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
- Limited comfort while driving long distances.
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Urus S 4.0T V8 if you care more about power; choose Maybach EQS SUV if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Urus S 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Maybach EQS SUV has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Urus S 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3003 mm, while Maybach EQS SUV has a wheelbase of 3,210. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Maybach EQS SUV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urus S 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive, while Maybach EQS SUV uses Four-Wheel Drive.