CarteaCompare CarsUrus S 4.0T V8 vs EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC

Urus S 4.0T V8 vs EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

305 km/h

260 km/h

8

/

3996 cc

/

/

GCC

Dimensions

4 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

5123 mm

5125 mm

2022 mm

2157 mm

1638 mm

1718 mm

3003 mm

3210 mm

617 L

645 L

172 m

/

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

/

75 L

/

7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

Digital

Digital

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Bucket

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.1

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

8

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

4.0 L

/

650 BHP - 800 BHP

357 BHP - 650

Automatic

1-speed direct drive (EV) & Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

4 Seater

5 - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

485 km - 700 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

4.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

666 BHP

357 BHP

850 Nm

800 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

10

/

options.Lithium-ion

/

265 kW

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Urus S 4.0T V8

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC

    • Remote key types

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
  • Unique and eye catching exterior design.
  • A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.

Negative

  • The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
  • High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
  • Limited comfort while driving long distances.

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEQS 450 SUV 4MATIC

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Urus S 4.0T V8 if you care more about power; choose EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lamborghini | Urus S 4.0T V8

VS

Mercedes Benz | Maybach EQS SUV

Lamborghini | Urus S 4.0T V8

VS

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-Maybach GLS 600

Lamborghini | Urus S 4.0T V8

VS

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+

Lamborghini | Urus S 4.0T V8

VS

BMW | XM 2025 V8

Lamborghini | Urus S 4.0T V8

VS

Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover 2024 5.0L V8 Autobiography LWB (525 PS)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Urus S 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Urus S 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3003 mm, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3210 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urus S 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.