V23 vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
19
/
4220
4490 mm
1915
1874 mm
1845
1613 mm
2735
2750 mm
1613
/
1641
/
42
/
40
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
7
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
255/55 R19
/
255/55 R19
/
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
134
153 BHP - 305 BHP
AT
TBD
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Engine
Electric
Electric
134
153 BHP
/
340 Nm
Motor
180
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
V23
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose V23 if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, V23 has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, V23 has a wheelbase of 2735, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. V23 uses No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.