VF6 2025 Eco vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17
/
4238
4490 mm
1820
1874 mm
1594
1613 mm
2730
2750 mm
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
12.9
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
174 BHP - 201 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
DHT
TBD
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
174 BHP
305 BHP
250
680 Nm
Motor
Single
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
VF6 2025 Eco
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose VF6 2025 Eco if you care more about power; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, VF6 2025 Eco has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, VF6 2025 Eco has a wheelbase of 2730, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. VF6 2025 Eco uses Front Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.