VF9 2025 Eco vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

6.6

6.5

531

≥400

123

/

/

160+160

Engine / Motor

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

7

7 Seater

20

/

5119

5209

2004

2010

1691

1731

3148

3110

212

/

Fuel Economy

75

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front & Back Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Triple

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

11

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6

/

6

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Independent, Double Wishbone

/

Multi-link with Air Spring

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

402 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

DHT

Automatic

Electric

Electric

TBD

320 km

7

6 - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

0.0 L

Electric

Electric

402 BHP

429 BHP

620

600

Motor

Dual Motor

/

Technologies

/

/

Eco / Normal / Sport

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • VF9 2025 Eco

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose VF9 2025 Eco if you care more about interior space; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Elite

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, VF9 2025 Eco has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, VF9 2025 Eco has a wheelbase of 3148, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, VF9 2025 Eco, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. VF9 2025 Eco uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.