Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S vs EQM5 T3 Edition Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
4
/
Dimensions
4 Seater
4 Seater
4384
5040 mm
1699
1910 mm
1465
1569 mm
2552
2990 mm
455
433 L
Fuel Economy
14.3
/
55
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
/
105 BHP
134 BHP
Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
4 Seater
4 Seater - 5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
105 BHP
134 BHP
153
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Steering Adjustment
- ABS
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQM5 T3 Edition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S if you care more about overall equipment; choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S has a wheelbase of 2552, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 T3 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S uses Front Wheel Drive, while EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive.