Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S vs Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ Comparison
Car Information
/
3.4
Engine / Motor
185
250
4
8
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
4384
4993
1699
1907
1465
1460
2552
2939
455
540
Fuel Economy
14.3
11.0
55
66
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
3.0 L - 3.0 L
105 BHP
367 - 449
Automatic
9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
4 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
612 BHP
153
850
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Steering Adjustment
- ABS
Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S has a wheelbase of 2552, while Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2939. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan S uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.