shale Comfort vs Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
170 km/h
/
1790 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4702
4460 mm
1903
1825 mm
1691
1620 mm
2765
2640 mm
382
407 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.8
22.2 Km/L
55
36 L
/
22.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
8
✓
/
8
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.8 L - 1798 L
228 BHP - 231 BHP
121 - 138 BHP
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic & Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT) & CVT
Gasoline
Hybrid & Petrol & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
230
122 BHP
370
163 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
shale Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- High reliability and good retention value
Negative
- Engine performance is poor in stimulation and traction
- Limited background storage space
- Unsatisfactory control of the entertainment system and the user interface
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose shale Comfort if you care more about price; choose Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, shale Comfort has a fuel consumption of 6.76, while Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV) has a fuel consumption of 4.5. Therefore, Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, shale Comfort has a wheelbase of 2765, while Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV) has a wheelbase of 2640 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, shale Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. shale Comfort uses Front Drive, while Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV) uses Front Wheel Drive.