shale Comfort vs Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
192
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4702
4395
1903
1795
1691
1562
2765
2655
382
430
Fuel Economy
14.8
16.7
55
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
✓
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.5 L
228 BHP - 231 BHP
155 BHP - 189 BHP
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230
155 BHP
370
200
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
shale Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pickshale Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose shale Comfort if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, shale Comfort has a fuel consumption of 6.76, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, shale Comfort has a wheelbase of 2765, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a wheelbase of 2655. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, shale Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. shale Comfort uses Front Drive, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.