CarteaCompare CarsWrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door) vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door) vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

210 km/h

/

6

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

4 Seater

7 Seater

2 Doors

5 Doors

4237 mm

5115 mm

1875 mm

1980 mm

1869 mm

1920 mm

2459 mm

2890 mm

898 L

1004 L

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

9.1 Km/L

9.4 Km/L

70 L

110 L

9.1 Km/L

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 6.4 L

3.3 L - 5.7 L

270 BHP - 470

240 BHP - 409

8AT & Automatic & Manual

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 - 5 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.6 L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

285 BHP

271 BHP

353 Nm

385 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

    • Rear Camera
  • Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Superior off-road capability
  • Classic and attractive design
  • Wide customization capability

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
  • The high price of fully equipped models

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door) if you care more about power; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2025 Limited+ 3.6L Plus

Jeep | Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 Limited 3.6L Plus

Jeep | Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Jeep | Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L

Jeep | Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2023 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door) has a fuel consumption of 10.99, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door) has a wheelbase of 2459 mm, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door) uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.