Wrangler Sahara 2.0T vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1496 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
5
4785 mm
4400 mm
1877 mm
1830 mm
1869 mm
1590 mm
3007 mm
2630 mm
487 L
/
254 m
/
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
7.1
87 L
51 L
7 Km/L
6.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
10.25
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
6
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 6.4 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
270 BHP - 470
156 - 197
8AT & Automatic & Manual
7 Speed DCT & 7DCT & CVT
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 - 5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
4
270 BHP
194 BHP
400 Nm
290
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Wrangler Sahara 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
C5 TECH 1.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Wrangler Sahara 2.0T if you care more about interior space; choose C5 TECH 1.5L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, C5 TECH 1.5L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2630 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sahara 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive, while C5 TECH 1.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.