Wrangler Sahara 2.0T vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR Comparison
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200
4
6
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
8 Seater
4 Doors
/
4785 mm
5170
1877 mm
1980
1869 mm
1930
3007 mm
2850
487 L
455
254 m
/
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
7.5
87 L
138
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 6.4 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
270 BHP - 470
240 BHP - 409
8AT & Automatic & Manual
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 - 5 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Halogen
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
270 BHP
271 BHP
400 Nm
385
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Wrangler Sahara 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Wrangler Sahara 2.0T if you care more about interior space; choose Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR has a fuel consumption of 13.33. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR has a wheelbase of 2850. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sahara 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR uses All Wheel Drive.