CarteaCompare CarsWrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD)

Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

240 km/h

6

/

3600 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

4785 mm

4447 mm

1877 mm

1841 mm

1801 mm

1624 mm

3007 mm

2675 mm

487 L

520 L

246 m

/

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

58.8 Km/L

87 L

43 L

7 Km/L

58.8 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

/

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 6.4 L

1.6 L - 1.6 L

270 BHP - 470

156 BHP - 300 BHP

8AT & Automatic & Manual

Automatic & Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 - 5 Seater

5 - 6 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Halogen

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.6 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

4

/

285 BHP

300 BHP

352 Nm

520 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD)

    • 360 Degree camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Superior off-road capability
  • Classic and attractive design
  • Wide customization capability

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
  • The high price of fully equipped models

Positive

  • Modern and distinctive exterior design
  • High quality and luxurious interior
  • Advanced and convenient driving techniques

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • Suspension needs improvement in comfort
  • The price is considered relatively high

Related comparisons

Editor's PickWrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T if you care more about price; choose 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2024 Long Range (AWD)

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Peugeot | 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD)

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP)

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI Advanced 2.0L

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Audi | Audi Q3 2023 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 1.7. Therefore, 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2675 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T uses Four Wheel Drive, while 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.