Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
6
6
3600 cc
3490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4785 mm
5115 mm
1877 mm
1980 mm
1801 mm
1920 mm
3007 mm
2890 mm
487 L
1004 L
246 m
221 m
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
87 L
110 L
7 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 6.4 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
270 BHP - 470
240 BHP - 409
8AT & Automatic & Manual
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 - 5 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
V
3.6 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
285 BHP
271 BHP
352 Nm
385 Nm
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.