Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
6
4
3600 cc
2490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4785 mm
4570 mm
1877 mm
1845 mm
1801 mm
1660 mm
3007 mm
2660 mm
487 L
/
246 m
/
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
87 L
55 L
7 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 6.4 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
270 BHP - 470
170 - 219
8AT & Automatic & Manual
8 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT)
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
4 - 5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
In-Line
3.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
285 BHP
203 BHP
352 Nm
243 Nm
/
None
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T if you care more about interior space; choose RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX has a wheelbase of 2660 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T uses Four Wheel Drive, while RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX uses Front Wheel Drive.