Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison

Car Information

/

12.8

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

170

6

/

3600 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

5

4785 mm

4323

1877 mm

1809

1801 mm

1653

3007 mm

2585

487 L

359/1166

246 m

145

/

1318

/

17

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

17.2

87 L

45

7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

Smart Key

Manual

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

Fabric

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Drivers and Passenger Airbag

/

Infotainment

12

10.1

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

4

/

/

Transmission

/

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Front Drive

/

McPherson Front Shock Absorber

/

H Torsional Beam

Wheels/brakes

/

Disc

/

Disc

/

215/55 R17

/

215/55 R17

Key Spec

2.0 L - 6.4 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

270 BHP - 470

112 BHP - 168

8AT & Automatic & Manual

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 - 5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

Halogen

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.6 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

4

/

285 BHP

118 BHP

352 Nm

180

/

88

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • ZS 1.5L STD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's PickZS 1.5L STD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T if you care more about interior space; choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2024 Long Range (AWD)

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Peugeot | 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD)

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP)

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI Advanced 2.0L

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Audi | Audi Q3 2023 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, ZS 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T uses Four Wheel Drive, while ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive.