CarteaCompare CarsX-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) vs EcoSport 1.5 Trend

X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) vs EcoSport 1.5 Trend Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

170 km/h

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

18

/

4

/

4680

3998 mm

2065

1765 mm

1730

1645 mm

2705

2521 mm

212

/

/

346 L

Fuel Economy

15.4

16.4 Km/L

55

52 L

/

16.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

12.3

/

/

/

TFT

/

Passenger Seat

/

Fabric/Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

/

10

/

BOSE

/

Transmission

/

/

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Independent strut

/

Multi Link

/

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Disc

/

Key Spec

2.5 L

1.5 L

132 BHP - 188 BHP

120 BHP

Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT

TBD

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder

/

181 BHP

120 BHP

181 @ 6,000

/

244

151 Nm

244 @ 4,000

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

AUTO-ECO-SPORT-SNOW-OFF ROAD

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD)

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • EcoSport 1.5 Trend

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
  • Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
  • High safety equipment increases confidence while driving

Negative

  • Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEcoSport 1.5 Trend

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) if you care more about interior space; choose EcoSport 1.5 Trend if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD)

VS

Exeed | RX Comfort 2.0T

Nissan | X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD)

VS

Exeed | VX Executive 2.0T

Nissan | X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD)

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2023 2.0T-GDI Black Gold

Nissan | X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD)

VS

Exeed | Exeed RX 2024 2.0T Comfort (FWD)

Nissan | X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD)

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2024 2.0T-GDI Black Gold

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a fuel consumption of 6.1. Therefore, EcoSport 1.5 Trend is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2705, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a wheelbase of 2521 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend uses Front Wheel Drive.