X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) vs Huge E2 Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
18
/
4
/
4680
/
2065
/
1730
/
2705
/
212
/
Fuel Economy
15.4
14.3
55
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Interior
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Passenger Seat
/
Fabric/Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
10
/
BOSE
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.5 L
1.5
132 BHP - 188 BHP
201 BHP - 202
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
7DCT & AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
201 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
/
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT-SNOW-OFF ROAD
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD)
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Huge E2
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHuge E2
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Huge E2 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Huge E2 has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2705, while Huge E2 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Huge E2 uses No data.