X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
17
19
4
/
4680
4810
2065
1925
1730
1742
2705
2800
212
/
Fuel Economy
16.1
13
55
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
10.25"
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
4
8
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Xtronic CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Drive
Front Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.5 L
2.0
132 BHP - 188 BHP
254
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
2.0T GDI
181 BHP
254
181 @ 6,000
/
244
390
244 @ 4,000
/
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
Eco + Normal + Sport
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats uses Front Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.