X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs AITO 9- 5 seater Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
22"
4
5
4680
5230
2065
1999
1730
1800
2705
3110
212
/
Fuel Economy
16.1
/
55
65L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Interior
7
15.6
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
4
23
/
16
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Xtronic CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
/
Intelligent air suspension
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.5 L
1.5L
132 BHP - 188 BHP
496 hp
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Electric
/
Galaxy
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
496 hp
181 @ 6,000
/
244
675Front:315/Rear:360
244 @ 4,000
/
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar
/
12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
AITO 9- 5 seater
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats if you care more about overall equipment; choose AITO 9- 5 seater if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AITO 9- 5 seater , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats uses Front Drive, while AITO 9- 5 seater uses Four-Wheel Drive.