X5 40i xDrive vs QX80 Sensory Bench Chairs Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
243 km/h
200
/
8
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4922 mm
5365
2004 mm
2030
1745 mm
1945
2975 mm
3075
645 L
470
Fuel Economy
11.4 Km/L
8.3
83 L
100
11.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
14
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
14
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
24
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
3.0 L - 5.0 L
3.5 L - 5.6 L
306 BHP - 530 BHP
400 BHP - 450
Automatic & CVT
9-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
3.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
340 BHP
450
450 Nm
700
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard / Eco / Sport / Personal / Rock / Sand
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X5 40i xDrive
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
QX80 Sensory Bench Chairs
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Positive
- Powerful motor and smooth performance
- Luxurious interior design and spacious space
- Advanced technology and intelligent features
Negative
- Low fuel consumption
- The large size of the car affects the controllability
- Maintenance costs and cutting prices are high
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X5 40i xDrive if you care more about fuel economy; choose QX80 Sensory Bench Chairs if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X5 40i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 8.77, while QX80 Sensory Bench Chairs has a fuel consumption of 12.05. Therefore, X5 40i xDrive is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X5 40i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2975 mm, while QX80 Sensory Bench Chairs has a wheelbase of 3075. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX80 Sensory Bench Chairs, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X5 40i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive, while QX80 Sensory Bench Chairs uses All Wheel Drive.