X70 Plus Comfort 1.6T vs XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1598 cc
2490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4749 mm
4680 mm
1900 mm
1840 mm
1720 mm
1725 mm
2745 mm
2706 mm
480 L
550 L
210 mm
/
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
15.6 Km/L
57 L
60 L
13 Km/L
15.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1.6 L
2.5 L
197 - 197
132 BHP - 188 BHP
7DCT & Automatic & DCT
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
None
4
4
197 BHP
188 BHP
290 Nm
244 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X70 Plus Comfort 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X70 Plus Comfort 1.6T if you care more about price; choose XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X70 Plus Comfort 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 7.69, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 6.41. Therefore, XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X70 Plus Comfort 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2745 mm, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2706 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X70 Plus Comfort 1.6T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X70 Plus Comfort 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) uses Front Wheel Drive.