X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs 5008 1.6T Allure plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
206 km/h
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
18
/
5 Doors
/
4838
4641 mm
1914
1844 mm
1775
1646 mm
2830
2840 mm
510 L
952 L
210 mm
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
16.4 Km/L
57 L
53 L
12 Km/L
16.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 1.6 L
197 - 254
156 BHP - 180
7DCT & Automatic
Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
6 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
254
165 BHP
390 Nm
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
5008 1.6T Allure plus
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price; choose 5008 1.6T Allure plus if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus has a fuel consumption of 6.1. Therefore, 5008 1.6T Allure plus is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus has a wheelbase of 2840 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 5008 1.6T Allure plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus uses Front Wheel Drive.