CarteaCompare CarsX90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs CX60 2025 High Plus

X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs CX60 2025 High Plus Comparison

Car Information

/

450

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

7

7 Seater

18

20 Inch

5 Doors

/

4838

4740

1914

1890

1775

1686

2830

/

510 L

/

210 mm

/

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

/

57 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

12 Inch

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

12

/

Bose

Transmission

/

8-speed Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

3.3 L - 3.3 L

197 - 254

280 HP - 284 BHP

7DCT & Automatic

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5 - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

3.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

254

284 BHP

390 Nm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • CX60 2025 High Plus

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX60 2025 High Plus

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose CX60 2025 High Plus if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Haval | Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Subaru | OUTBACK 2.5i S AWD

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Peugeot | 5008 1.6T Active Plus

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Peugeot | 5008 1.6T Allure plus

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T Allure

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while CX60 2025 High Plus uses Four-Wheel Drive.