X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs Dashing 1.6L Turbo Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1590 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4838
4590 mm
1914
1900 mm
1775
1685 mm
2830
2720 mm
510 L
/
210 mm
160 mm
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
12 Km/L
57 L
57 L
12 Km/L
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
15.6
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
8
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.6 L
197 - 254
154 - 197 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
None
4
4
254
194 BHP
390 Nm
290 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Dashing 1.6L Turbo
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about interior space; choose Dashing 1.6L Turbo if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while Dashing 1.6L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive.