X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs Song Plus AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
7
5
18
19
5 Doors
5
4838
4775
1914
1890
1775
1680
2830
2765
510 L
574
210 mm
/
/
Flush Door
/
1975
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
19.8
57 L
/
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
Leather
Sensatec Leather
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
6
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag, Integrated side air curtains
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
4x Front Sensor, 4x Rear Sensor
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Seats
Infotainment
12.3
15.6-inch rotating screen
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
8
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infinity
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Multi- link(5 links)
Wheels/brakes
/
VENTILATED DISC
/
DISC
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
197 - 254
197 BHP - 360 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
254
360 BHP
390 Nm
596
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical, Sand and Mud Terrain Mode
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
596
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Song Plus AWD
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price; choose Song Plus AWD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Song Plus AWD has a fuel consumption of 5.05. Therefore, Song Plus AWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while Song Plus AWD has a wheelbase of 2765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while Song Plus AWD uses Four-Wheel Drive.