X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison

Car Information

/

598 km

/

800V

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

7

5

18

/

5 Doors

/

4838

/

1914

/

1775

/

2830

/

510 L

514

210 mm

/

/

64

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

/

57 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

Dinamica Microfibre

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Sport Seats Plus

/

11.9

/

Safety

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

14.5

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

/

Battery/Charging

/

270

/

11

/

10 min

Transmission

/

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

/

197 - 254

TBD

7DCT & Automatic

DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 - 7

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

254

/

390 Nm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Lithium-ion

/

489

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Renault | Renault Koleos 2023 2.5L LE (4WD)

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Geely | Geely Monjaro 2024 2.0TD Premium GF (4WD)

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.