X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs T2 i-DM Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5
18
/
5 Doors
5
4838
4785
1914
2006
1775
1875
2830
2800
510 L
752
210 mm
220
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
18.5
57 L
70 L
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
15.6
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
12
Transmission
/
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.5
197 - 254
154 BHP - 600
7DCT & Automatic
3DHT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
Twin Turbo
/
4
4
254
154 BHP
390 Nm
220
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
T2 i-DM
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and modern exterior design
- High fuel efficiency
- Efficient hybrid propulsion system
Negative
- Luggage compartment space is limited
- Lack of digital entertainment options
- Traction ability is not the best in its class
Related comparisons
Editor's PickT2 i-DM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about interior space; choose T2 i-DM if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while T2 i-DM has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, T2 i-DM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while T2 i-DM has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while T2 i-DM uses Four Wheel Drive.