X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs X95 1.6T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
185 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1598 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
18
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4838
4858 mm
1914
1925 mm
1775
1780 mm
2830
2855 mm
510 L
/
210 mm
210 mm
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
12.3 Km/L
57 L
57 L
12 Km/L
12.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
12
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L
197 - 254
197 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
254
197 BHP
390 Nm
290 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
X95 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price; choose X95 1.6T if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while X95 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 8.13. Therefore, X95 1.6T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while X95 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2855 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X95 1.6T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while X95 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.