XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum vs Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230 km/h
210
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4425 mm
5.075
1910 mm
1.969
1652 mm
1.716
2702 mm
2.930
460 L
407
/
✓
Fuel Economy
13.9 Km/L
11.8
54 L
74
13.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
190 BHP
230 BHP
300 Nm
420
Key Spec
/
2.5 L - 2500 L
/
226 BHP - 273 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 Seater
Motor
/
N/A
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum has a wheelbase of 2702 mm, while Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.