XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD) vs Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4900 mm
4620 mm
1865 mm
1910 mm
1865 mm
1780 mm
2850 mm
2738 mm
Fuel Economy
78 L
60 L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 2500 L
2.0 L - 2000 L
165 BHP
196 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
165 BHP
196 BHP
241 Nm
325 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Wide load capacity
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technological equipment
- The quality of the cabin materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD) if you care more about interior space; choose Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2738 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive, while Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive.