CarteaCompare CarsZR-V Apex Edition vs Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2

ZR-V Apex Edition vs Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2 Comparison

Car Information

Gasoline

/

本田

/

132.4

/

240

/

4567x1840x1621

/

6.06

/

1.5

/

Engine / Motor

4

/

/

190 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

1488

/

18 英寸

/

4567

4828 mm

1840

1943 mm

1621

1792 mm

2657

2916 mm

380

782 L

186

/

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

/

10 Km/L

/

93 L

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

12

/

/

Transmission

/

CVT

/

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

麦弗逊式独立悬挂

/

多连杆式独立悬挂

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

225/55 R18

/

225/55 R18

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

3.6 L - 6.4 L

178 BHP - 180

286 BHP - 707 BHP

Automatic & CVT

8AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.5

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

1.5L VTEC Turbo

/

/

4

/

180

290 BHP

132.4

/

6000

/

240

350 Nm

1700-4500

/

直喷

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ZR-V Apex Edition

    • Power Tailgate
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Comfortable and practical interior design
  • Good fuel efficiency
  • Advanced security technologies and systems

Negative

  • Luggage capacity is somewhat limited
  • Pricing may be higher than competitors
  • Modest engine performance compared to some competitors

Positive

  • Versatility of options for powerful engines
  • Impressive off-road driving capabilities
  • High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies

Negative

  • High fuel consumption for some models
  • High price compared to some competitors
  • Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces

Related comparisons

Editor's PickZR-V Apex Edition

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ZR-V Apex Edition if you care more about price; choose Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2 if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Honda | ZR-V Apex Edition

VS

Exeed | VX Flagship 2.0T

Honda | ZR-V Apex Edition

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2023 2.0T-GDI Flagship

Honda | ZR-V Apex Edition

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2024 2.0T-GDI Flagship

Honda | ZR-V Apex Edition

VS

Peugeot | 3008 1.6T GT

Honda | ZR-V Apex Edition

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ZR-V Apex Edition has a fuel consumption of 6.06, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2 has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, ZR-V Apex Edition is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ZR-V Apex Edition has a wheelbase of 2657, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2 has a wheelbase of 2916 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZR-V Apex Edition uses Front Drive, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2 uses All Wheel Drive.