ZS 1.3T LUX vs Urban Cruiser GL Comparison

Car Information

9.8

/

Engine / Motor

185

/

/

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

1318

/

17

17

5

/

4323

4365

1809

1795

1653

1645

2585

2600

359/1166

/

145

210

Fuel Economy

17.2

19.8

45

45 L

Comfort

/

/

/

Smart Key

Keyless Entry

Manual

/

/

/

Interior

/

Driver Seat

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Virtual Cluster

/

Passenger Seat

/

Leather

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

/

Rear

Safety

Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags Curtain Airbags

Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.1

9

/

6

4

/

/

/

Transmission

6

/

6AT

6 Speed Automatic Transmission

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

McPherson Front Shock Absorber

/

H Torsional Beam

/

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Disc

/

215/55 R17

215/60 R17

215/55 R17

215/60 R17

Key Spec

1.3 L - 1.5 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

112 BHP - 168

101 - 101

6AT & Automatic & CVT

6 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.3 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

160 BHP

101 BHP

120

/

230

135

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ZS 1.3T LUX

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
  • Urban Cruiser GL

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Positive

  • Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
  • Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
  • Reliable service network and rich security features

Negative

  • The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
  • Limited back row space for large families
  • The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors

Related comparisons

Editor's PickZS 1.3T LUX

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ZS 1.3T LUX if you care more about price; choose Urban Cruiser GL if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | ZS 1.3T LUX

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T LS

MG | ZS 1.3T LUX

VS

Maxus | D60 Executive 1.5L

MG | ZS 1.3T LUX

VS

Toyota | Veloz GLX

MG | ZS 1.3T LUX

VS

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

MG | ZS 1.3T LUX

VS

BAIC | X7 Honor-LV5

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.3T LUX has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Urban Cruiser GL has a fuel consumption of 5.05. Therefore, Urban Cruiser GL is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ZS 1.3T LUX has a wheelbase of 2585, while Urban Cruiser GL has a wheelbase of 2600. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Urban Cruiser GL, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.3T LUX uses Front Drive, while Urban Cruiser GL uses Front Wheel Drive.