ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs GX3 PRO GK Comparison

Car Information

12.8

/

Engine / Motor

170

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

1318

/

18

/

5

/

4430

4005

1818

1575

1635

1760

2610

2480

359/1166

250

145

/

Fuel Economy

15.9

/

45

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

/

/

Interior

/

Driver Seat

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Passenger Seat

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front

Safety

Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags

2

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row

Infotainment

10.1

3.5

/

/

6

2

Transmission

CVT

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Drive

McPherson Front Shock Absorber

/

H Torsional Beam

/

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Disc

/

215/55 R17

205/60 R16

215/55 R17

205/60 R16

Key Spec

1.3 L - 1.5 L

1.5

112 BHP - 168

100 BHP - 102

6AT & Automatic & CVT

CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.5

Gasoline

Gasoline

168

100 BHP

88

/

180

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Rear

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
  • GX3 PRO GK

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Push Button Start
    • Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
    • Collision Safety Cut-Out
    • Number of Airbags
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGX3 PRO GK

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 if you care more about interior space; choose GX3 PRO GK if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Innovation

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2021 1.6L (115HP) Active+

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Dongfeng | AX7 E1

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2024 1.6L Active+ (115HP)

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 has a fuel consumption of 6.29, while GX3 PRO GK has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 has a wheelbase of 2610, while GX3 PRO GK has a wheelbase of 2480. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 uses Front Drive, while GX3 PRO GK uses Front Drive.