CarteaCompare CarsZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper Comparison

Car Information

12.8

/

Engine / Motor

170

210

/

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

1318

/

18

/

5

/

4430

4549

1818

1860

1635

1689

2610

2734

359/1166

/

145

/

Fuel Economy

15.9

14.9

45

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

/

/

Interior

/

Driver Seat

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Passenger Seat

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.1

/

/

6

/

/

/

Transmission

CVT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

McPherson Front Shock Absorber

/

H Torsional Beam

/

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Disc

/

215/55 R17

/

215/55 R17

/

/

Key Spec

1.3 L - 1.5 L

2.0 L

112 BHP - 168

216 BHP - 217 BHP

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

168

216 BHP

88

/

180

325

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
  • Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Innovation

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2021 1.6L (115HP) Active+

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Dongfeng | AX7 E1

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2024 1.6L Active+ (115HP)

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 has a fuel consumption of 6.29, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 has a wheelbase of 2610, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 uses Front Drive, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive.