3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) vs Q3 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
206 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4447 mm
4385 mm
1841 mm
2019 mm
1624 mm
1608 mm
2675 mm
2603 mm
520 L
460 L
Fuel Economy
58.8 Km/L
15.4 Km/L
43 L
58 L
58.8 Km/L
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1.6 L
1.4 L - 2.0 L
156 BHP - 300 BHP
150 BHP - 220 BHP
Automatic & Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 6 Seater
5 Seater
Engine
1.6 L
1.4 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
300 BHP
150 BHP
520 Nm
250 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD)
- 360 Degree camera
Q3 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and distinctive exterior design
- High quality and luxurious interior
- Advanced and convenient driving techniques
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Suspension needs improvement in comfort
- The price is considered relatively high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ3 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Q3 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 1.7, while Q3 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2675 mm, while Q3 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) has a wheelbase of 2603 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Q3 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.