3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) vs Q3 35 TFSI Advanced 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
206 km/h
/
4
/
1984 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4447 mm
4485 mm
1841 mm
1856 mm
1624 mm
1585 mm
2675 mm
2680 mm
520 L
530 L
/
5 Doors
/
170 m
Fuel Economy
58.8 Km/L
10 Km/L
43 L
58 L
58.8 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1.6 L
1.4 L - 2.0 L
156 BHP - 300 BHP
150 BHP - 220 BHP
Automatic & Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 6 Seater
5 Seater
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
300 BHP
150 BHP
520 Nm
320 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD)
- 360 Degree camera
Q3 35 TFSI Advanced 2.0L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and distinctive exterior design
- High quality and luxurious interior
- Advanced and convenient driving techniques
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Suspension needs improvement in comfort
- The price is considered relatively high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Q3 35 TFSI Advanced 2.0L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 1.7, while Q3 35 TFSI Advanced 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2675 mm, while Q3 35 TFSI Advanced 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Q3 35 TFSI Advanced 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Q3 35 TFSI Advanced 2.0L uses Front Wheel Drive.