Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable vs 5 4WD Premium Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
200 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4160
4710 mm
1810
1930 mm
1670
1620 mm
2560
2875 mm
348
367 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
13.9
/
52
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L
0.0 L -
123 BHP
220 BHP - 530 BHP
Automatic
AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
123 BHP
530 BHP
160
940 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable
- Keyless Entry
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
5 4WD Premium
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChangan CS35 2016 Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable if you care more about price; choose 5 4WD Premium if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while 5 4WD Premium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2560, while 5 4WD Premium has a wheelbase of 2875 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 5 4WD Premium, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive, while 5 4WD Premium uses Four Wheel Drive.