CarteaCompare CarsCX-30 URBANE vs H2 1.5T Intelligent

CX-30 URBANE vs H2 1.5T Intelligent Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

170 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

18"

/

4395

4335 mm

1795

1814 mm

1540

1695 mm

2655

2560 mm

/

500 L

Fuel Economy

16.1

12.2 Km/L

48

55 L

/

12.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

Rear View Camera

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

Dynamic Stability Control & Traction

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

/

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L

153 HP - 155 BHP

147 BHP - 150 BHP

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Dual Exhaust - Chrome

/

Engine

2.0L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

153 HP

148 BHP

153 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

200

210 Nm

200 NM @ 4000 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-30 URBANE

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • H2 1.5T Intelligent

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickH2 1.5T Intelligent

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-30 URBANE if you care more about fuel economy; choose H2 1.5T Intelligent if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-30 URBANE

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mazda | CX-30 URBANE

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mazda | CX-30 URBANE

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mazda | CX-30 URBANE

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mazda | CX-30 URBANE

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-30 URBANE has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, CX-30 URBANE is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-30 URBANE has a wheelbase of 2655, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-30 URBANE, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-30 URBANE uses No data, while H2 1.5T Intelligent uses Front Wheel Drive.