CarteaCompare CarsCX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI vs EMKOO 1.5 GE

CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI vs EMKOO 1.5 GE Comparison

Car Information

Dimensions

5

5

235/50 R20

18

4740

4680

1890

1901

1688

1670

2870

2750

Fuel Economy

15.4

/

58

/

Comfort

/

Rear View Camera

/

Electric

/

Interior

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

7 Inch LCD

/

Passenger Seat

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake

/

/

Speed Alert DSA: Display Only

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

All Seats

Infotainment

/

/

8

6

/

10.25 Inch

/

/

Transmission

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE

DCT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

/

/

McPherson Suspension

/

Multi-link Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

235/60 R18

/

235/60 R18

Key Spec

3.3 L - 3.3 L

1.5 L - 2.0 L

280 HP - 284 BHP

138 BHP - 177 BHP

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic

Automatic & DCT & DHT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 7 Seater

5 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

Piano Black Honey-Comb

/

/

/

Rear Bumper Guard

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

3.3L

1.5 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)

/

280 HP

140 BHP

284 PS @ 5000 RPM

/

450

/

450 NM @ 2000 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • EMKOO 1.5 GE

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Spare Wheel
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI if you care more about price; choose EMKOO 1.5 GE if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while EMKOO 1.5 GE has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while EMKOO 1.5 GE has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EMKOO 1.5 GE uses No data.